JSPP follows a well-structured peer review process designed to ensure that all published articles meet high academic and ethical standards. The process is conducted in a fair, transparent, and constructive manner, providing meaningful support to authors while ensuring that submitted research is critically evaluated by qualified experts before being considered for publication within the academic record.
Upon receipt of a manuscript, the editorial team conducts an initial screening to assess whether the submission aligns with the scope of the journal, complies with submission guidelines, and meets the minimum quality standards required for further consideration.
Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are forwarded to independent external reviewers who are subject-matter experts. These reviewers evaluate the work objectively, providing detailed and constructive feedback along with professional recommendations.
Based on the reviewers’ comments, authors may be requested to undertake minor or major revisions. This stage enhances clarity, accuracy, and the overall academic quality of the manuscript.
Following the review and revision process, the editor makes the final decision regarding the manuscript. This may result in acceptance, further revision, or rejection, and is communicated clearly to the author.
This peer-review process ensures the quality, credibility, and integrity of JSPP publications while supporting authors in presenting their research in the most appropriate and academically rigorous manner.
This peer-reviewing technique can be applied to guarantee the quality and credibility of publications of the JSPP and help the authors to provide their works in the most appropriate format.
